MCG Reports
Home Entertainment : Opportunity Analysis and Forecast 2004
Table of Contents
___________________________________________________
Table of Contents
___________________________________________________
| Executive Summary | 2 | ||
| Home Entertainment Displays >30” Forecast and Analysis | 6 | ||
| 1.1 Market and Product Definitions | 6 | ||
| 1.2 Market Trends & Growth Factors | 9 | ||
| 1.3 Product Performance and Features | 10 | ||
| 1.4 Forecast Overview for Home Entertainment Displays > 30” | 14 | ||
| 1.4.1 Microdisplay RPTV Sales Opportunity Exceeds 22M Units | 15 | ||
| 1.4.2 Overview of the Optimistic Case – Bigger is Better | 20 | ||
| 1.4.3 Overview of the Conservative Case – Flatter is Better | 21 | ||
| 1.5 The Optimistic Case – Detailed Analysis | 23 | ||
| 1.5.1 30-36” Segment – LCDs Bury CRTs | 27 | ||
| 1.5.2 36-46” Segment – LCDs and MD RPTVs Challenge PDP | 29 | ||
| 1.5.3 46-56” Segment – PDP and MD RPTV Bury RP CRT | 34 | ||
| 1.5.4 56-66” Segment – The Playground for MD RPTV | 38 | ||
| 1.5.5 Over 66” Segment – MD RPTV Stokes Demand | 42 | ||
| 1.5.6 Summary Figures for Optimistic Case Forecast | 46 | ||
| 1.5.7 Summary of Optimistic Case RPTV Pricing by Technology | 48 | ||
| 1.6 The Conservative Case – Detailed Analysis | 52 | ||
| 1.6.1 30-36” Segment – LCDs Bury CRTs | 55 | ||
| 1.6.2 36-46” Segment – LCDs Challenge PDP, small MD RPTV share | 57 | ||
| 1.6.3 46-56” Segment – PDP and MD RPTV Bury RP CRT | 62 | ||
| 1.6.4 56-66” Segment – The Playground for MD RPTV | 65 | ||
| 1.6.5 Over 66” Segment – MD RPTV Increases Demand | 69 | ||
| 1.6.6 Summary Figures for Conservative Case Forecast | 71 | ||
| 1.6.7 Summary of Conservative Case RPTV Pricing by Technology | 74 | ||
| 1.7 Competitive Overview of Microdisplay Technologies – DMD, HTPS, LCOS | 77 | ||
| 1.7.1 Projection Metrics | 77 | ||
| 1.7.2 System Architecture | 77 | ||
| 1.7.3 Comparison of Architectures | 81 | ||
| 1.7.4 Comparison of Microdisplay Efficiencies | 84 | ||
| 1.7.5 Competitive Comparison of Microdisplays in RPTVs Over Time | 88 | ||
| 1.7.6 DMD vs. HTPS vs. LCOS – Competitive Positioning | 91 | ||
| 1.8 Demand for Microdisplays – Optimistic Case | 92 | ||
| 1.8.1 Demand Overview – Optimistic Case | 93 | ||
| 1.8.2 Optimistic Case Technology Shares by Screen Size Battleground | 96 | ||
| 1.8.3 Sales by Technology and Definition – Optimistic Case | 104 | ||
| 1.8.4 Optimistic Case – Microdisplay Sales Units and $ by Technology | 112 | ||
| 1.8.5 Microdisplay Pricing by Definition/Technology | 117 | ||
| 1.8.6 Demand for Microdisplays for Front Projection | 123 | ||
| 1.8.7 Total Demand for Microdisplays – RPTV and Front Projection | 129 | ||
| 1.9 Demand for Microdisplays – Conservative Case | 133 | ||
| 1.9.1 Demand Overview – Conservative Case | 133 | ||
| 1.9.2 Conservative Case Technology Shares by Screen Size Battleground | 135 | ||
| 1.9.3 Sales by Technology and Definition – Conservative Case | 144 | ||
| 1.9.4 Conservative Case – Microdisplay Sales Units and $ by Technology | 150 | ||
| 1.9.5 Conservative Demand for Microdisplays for Front Projection | 154 | ||
| 1.9.6 Total Demand for Microdisplays – RPTV and Front Projection | 162 | ||
| Home Entertainment Company Profiles | 168 | ||